Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

15 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 14	April 16 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

GoSun Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally AI generated with a bunch of fake sources. When the nonexistent sources, the unsupported information, and a whole lot of empty promotional fluff had been taken out, what remains is a stub article with a few sources mentioning products manufactured by the company, but nothing to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. bonadea contributions talk 18:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Ohio. bonadea contributions talk 18:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kaye Tuckerman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. AI generated and at least some refs are fake. Polygnotus (talk) 17:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and can we just find some way to speedy these. Btw Polygnotus thanks for the heads up re. ANI, although the guy was blocked by the time I got there :) Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 18:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Theatre, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Aram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding anything like enough in the article or elsewhere to pass WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Edwardx (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Armenia, and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kalypso Nicolaïdis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She ought to be notable but a BEFORE search is only returning material BY her, not ABOUT her. Tagged for a lack of sources for 8 years already. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, France, and Greece. Cabayi (talk) 17:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GEMS Founders School Dubai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mainly referenced with primary sources. Non-notable private school, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. Gheus (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and United Arab Emirates. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Homeopathy Day

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no independent WP:RS WP:SIGCOV for this promotional made-up observance day, which thus fails WP:GNG. The sources in the page are all unbylined content of dubious reliability per WP:NEWSORGINDIA ([1], [2], [3]), or else credulous articles that push the validity of homeopathy ([4], [5]). I already deleted a section claiming "promising results" from homeopathy but sourced to the low-quality sources above, which is unacceptable for this subject matter per WP:MEDRS. The final source is NationalToday.com, a website created by a marketing agency that publishes lists of observance days listed and paid for by brands/advertisers. Coverage found in a BEFORE search is similarly unbylined or WP:CHURNALISM by SEO-driven low-quality news sources with no independent reporting on this day as a concept. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Medicine. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Green Doctor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. My Green Doctor provides free brochures, posters, and other teaching tools to help helps share wise choices with patients and families. The name is mentioned often, but usually in the context of marijuana. Bunch of press releases, sponsored content, a blog or two. Some of the references are fake. Polygnotus (talk) 17:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management, Education, Medicine, and Florida. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...and also delete. Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 18:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Table Space

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about an Indian coworking provider fails WP:NCORP. The coverage consists of routine WP:ORGTRIV coverage related to capital raises, expansion of the business, etc. ([6], [7], [8]), much of it unbylined and thus questionable per WP:NEWSORGINDIA ([9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. There's also some coverage of the death of its founder ([15], [16]) that constitutes WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs. I didn't find anything qualifying in my BEFORE search and there's no obvious AtD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Karnataka. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Diban clashes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Insignificant clashes article, which doesn't have content that can be expanded. Can be merged to Rojava–Islamist conflict. Ecrusized (talk) 16:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support since this article looks to just be about a rather small skirmish between some tribal gunmen and the SDF, but I think its info should be merged into the Eastern Syria Insurgency article instead; the article on them doesn't mention them as being explicitly Islamist, and they're already in the article's infobox. Asclepias tuberosa (talk) 16:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, and Syria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025 Daraa clashes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insignificant clashes article which gives little to no information to the readers. WP:NOTNEWS. Can be merged to Western Syria clashes (December 2024–present). Ecrusized (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support since the article's small (the timeline only has 3 small sentences), but idk if it should merged into the Western Syria Clashes article because that's specifically about Latakia/Tartus and western Homs/Hama (though it could just be renamed to something like Assadist insurgency).

I was gonna propose making a Mohsen al-Haymed article, but he's only been reported on in 3 separate months - April 2024, January 2025, and March 2025, which might not be enough coverage for a separate article.

(If this article isn't deleted than it should be renamed to something like 2025 al-Sanamayn Clashes or al-Sanamayn Clashes (2024-2025)) Asclepias tuberosa (talk) 17:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, and Syria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Grieves

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography lacks significant coverage in secondary sources. I found this source but unfortunately it is just a mention which is not enough to pass WP:GNG. Gheus (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Engineering. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edílson (footballer, born 1993)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. This played allegedly acted for several important Brazilian football teams, but he doesn't have any signal of WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Sportspeople, and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ TheRas IsBack! 15:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhuja

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Suggesting to merge with Bombay mix, they seem like they're basically the same thing and the article even states Bombay Mix is another name for this in Britain. TheRas IsBack! 15:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I fat fingered this one. I'll add a merge tag. TheRas IsBack! 15:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Omar Albertto

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. I can't find any coverage except for 1988 article in LA Times. Article is completely promotional and was created by banned user. —Kaliforniyka^Hi! 20:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. —Kaliforniyka^Hi! 20:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Panama. Shellwood (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. While most of the sources (both in the article and in a quick google search) are pretty low quality, I've found a couple that I think are usable for notability purposes. Mr Feel Good Academy of Fashion Arts and Sciences Ageist, and LA Style. He was also quoted in a 1994 issue of Cosmopolitan[17] but I am not sure if that article provided substantial coverage. His heyday as an agent appears to have been in pre- and early internet days so more sources may be available offline. Article should be trimmed and rewritten to avoid promotion and unsourced detail but I think there is some substance behind the glitz. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I'm not knowledgeable about fashion, but a quick online search shows a few different profiles that indicate notability as Eluchil404 listed. Article does need a significant rewrite to meet quality standards though.

Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 00:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not really encylopedic. Article here since 2016. With such poor sourcing after this time, it means not even editors seem to care about the subject. Ramos1990 (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: See WP:SURMOUNTABLE and WP:NOEFFORT in particular - deletion is a question of subject notability, not article quality. Anerdw (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cannot find any source that can be suitable for this article, just promotional content and profiles 201.225.3.154 (talk) 03:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 00:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage. Iban14mxl (talk) 21:48, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete In its current form, the article is a borderline WP:G11. Taking on board the sources, I don't think there's enough to blow up and start over. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 14:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article reads as if it was made by an AI. Very biased and poorly sourced

Thegoofhere (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing Guild

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks any reliable sourcing, and is almost entirely a plot summary. With the exception of this article (https://www.inverse.com/entertainment/dune-foundation-spacers-guild-navigators-spice), all sources I found were low-quality Valnet sources. Industrial Insect (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, Literature, Film, and Popular culture. Industrial Insect (talk) 14:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Industrial Insect Comment Some sources were brought up in the last AfD just three months ago that resulted in a Keep consensus. I haven't reviewed them myself, but just making you aware in case you haven't seen them. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see that AfD until after I had opened this one, but even with the sources brought up I still believe the article isn't notable. 2 of them are Valnet churnalism, and the geopolitical article barely mentions the guild. Industrial Insect (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify. Looks like there is discussion of it in academia. I agree with Industrial Insect that the article as it stands now is mostly a plot summary in the context of the Dune universe (and therefore the content is more suitable for a fandom wiki). TurboSuperA+_(connect) 15:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Industrial Insect:
- a) Lacks any reliable sourcing: What about the 16-page-chapter in The Science of Dune listed in the article's references?
- b) What about WP:6MONTHS?
- c) Did you check out the sources already listed at the top of the Talk page? If you've overlooked both them and the old AfDs, that seems a lot like step B.4 of WP:BEFORE has been skipped. All those steps are there for a reason, to avoid wasting editors' time. Daranios (talk) 15:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
a) I haven't read it. Seems fine, but one source isn't enough to carry an entire article

b) I accept full responsibility for that. I was completely unaware of the previous AfD, and I failed to check the edit history.

c) Duneinfo is a fansite and as such is not appropriate for establishing notability. I can't comment on "Paul's Empire: Imperialism and Assemblage Theory in Frank Herbert's Dune" yet because the link gives me a 404, but based on the previous AfD it looks like a plot summary. Industrial Insect (talk) 15:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here or here would be alternative links. Daranios (talk) 17:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I skimmed through the article, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but it seems like the article doesn't provide much analysis on the Guild itself. It's only really mentioned during the plot summarization. It's definitely a good article, but it's not particularly useful as a source here. Industrial Insect (talk) 17:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we are getting into details here, but my 2 cents here: Not sure if the importance of the Spacing Guild and its bureaucratic structure as the real power in the empire is still plot summary or already analysis. But like below, brief but non-trivial analysis of the Spacing Guild being an expression for capitalism: "Moreover, the capitalistic nature of the spice trade and the Spacing Guild are ripe for an analysis based upon the issues of capitalism and globalization discussed in Empire." Would be interesting if someone followed up on Rudd's suggestion of analysis. Google Scholar shows two hits among the six citations of Rudd's paper, both paywalled. There's some preview here, e.g. p 57 (more on pages 20, 72, 94, but no preview). Daranios (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just collecting, "Epic World-Building: Names and Cultures in Dune" has brief but non-trivial analysis. Daranios (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also skimmed, (take with a dose of salt), there is one sentence of analysis where the author compares the Guild to those that existed during medieval Europe. Industrial Insect (talk) 17:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I've meant, too, and how that image feeds back into the atmosphere/perception of the Dune universe. Daranios (talk) 18:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another very relevant web article, not Valnet this time: Denis Villeneuve's Dune Movies Never Got These Big Villains From the Books Right. Daranios (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Komi Dje

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability separate from Molodtsov alphabet, no content that isn't already covered in Komi alphabets. Janhrach (talk) 14:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Russia. Janhrach (talk) 14:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KHAD-KGB campaign in Pakistan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject. The article is full of exceptional claims and WP:OR. The sources are not supporting the subject, thus there is also a crisis over WP:V. >>> Extorc.talk 14:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I cannot think of this subject to be anything more than a non-notable conspiracy theory. Agletarang (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Life of Luxury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined an A7 tag as I found one source, but that's all I could find. The article is cited entirely to the YouTube channel, and there are hardly any independent sources that show it's worthy of an encyclopedia article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I nominated it for speedy because the article had no independent sources, made no actual claim to notability, and the only source I could find was a local one-off report from when it had just started in 2019. Fram (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the lack of reliable secondary sources make this more appropriate for something like Fandom, rather than Wikipedia. This is a Battle for Dream Island sort of situation where the YouTube channel is very popular, but hardly any reliable secondary sources cover it.

There is an unrelated 2003 movie also called "Life of Luxury" (as mentioned at "List of programs broadcast by TV3 in Norway"), but that topic doesn't seem notable enough for a separate article, either. ApexParagon (talk) 14:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only source I could find is this local news coverage of a 2019 video, which is probably what Fram is referring to above. In the absence of other secondary references, that single news mention is not enough to WP:GNG. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 18:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of the most common U.S. place names

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Majority of this is OR; I just don't see this 200s-era mega list actually meeting WP:NLIST. E_F⁵ 13:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Irish place names in other countries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All but one entry is uncited. This fails WP:NLIST; we really need to crack down on these old, uncited naming-related lists. E_F⁵ 13:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Lists. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of irregularly spelt places in the United Kingdom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of irregularly spelled places in the United States, article is near-identical. E_F⁵ 13:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTHOW and WP:OR jolielover♥talk 15:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was notified of this discussion because List of places in the United Kingdom with counterintuitive pronunciations was merged back into List of irregularly spelt places in the United Kingdom after this 6 February 2022 discussion. I "created" the page on 27 July 2014, by splitting it from List of places in the United Kingdom and Ireland with counterintuitive pronunciations, per Talk:List of places in the United Kingdom and Ireland with counterintuitive pronunciations#Post-expand include size limit exceeded. The three pages, after the 3-way split, originally were titled:

@ 05:14, 12 May 2020 Starbeam2 moved List of places in the United Kingdom and Ireland with counterintuitive pronunciations to List of places in the United Kingdom with counterintuitive pronunciations (Ireland is a separate country and i've moved the Republic of Ireland names to a separate article.)

@ 17:10, 22 May 2020 Starbeam2 moved List of places in England with counterintuitive pronunciations to English places spelled irregularly

@ 13:58, 23 May 2020 Nardog moved English places spelled irregularly to List of irregularly spelled places in England (WP:NCLIST; WP:CONSISTENT with List of places in England, etc.)

@ 10:39, 16 September 2020 Chocolateediter moved List of irregularly spelled places in England to List of irregularly spelt places in England (British English not American English). wikt:spelt.

@ 23:08, 22 December 2020 Starbeam2 moved List of irregularly spelt places in England to List of irregularly spelt places in the United Kingdom (adding the few non-England placenames)

Hah. The issue that caused me to split the article seems to have gone away, probably because the template(s) causing the problem have since been made more efficient by being rewritten to use Lua modules.

Ireland was split from the UK and Ireland, and moved to List of irregularly spelled English names#Ireland. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of irregularly spelled English names. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In addition to the usual "WP:SHORTCUT" reasons, this has been an unstable mess, leading to the wasting of multiple editors' time, splitting and re-merging, and moving pages around between the UK and Ireland, and confusion about the distinction between irregular pronunciations and irregular spellings. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tian Boothe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. A lot of the sources are press releases and blogs, and the reliability of AllHipHop, although listed on WP:A/S based on one comment in 2008, has been questioned multiple times.[18][19][20] The article creator appears to have a history of creating articles with COI and paid editing issues. Frost 13:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Women, and Jamaica. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Svartner (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom ,Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carter-Newton House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article seems to function as an extended family history related to the Carter-Newton House, rather than an encyclopedic entry about a notable subject. It suffers from a near-complete lack of reliable, independent sources, making the vast majority of its content unverifiable (WP:V) and potentially original research (WP:OR) by a user whose name implies a relation to the owners. Article fails to establish the notability (WP:N) of the house, appearing more like a genealogical record (WP:NOTGENEALOGY). — Arcaist ^(contr ^—talk) 13:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. — Arcaist ^(contr ^—talk) 13:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ge with dot above

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Presumably does not pass WP:GNG. Janhrach (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Middle East, and Russia. Janhrach (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Ge (Cyrillic). I don't think it merits its own article, but given that "Г̇" is part of the Cyrillic script and a variation of the basic "Г", I think its existence could be briefly mentioned there. Flip^and Flopped ㋡ 18:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology of the repression of the Catalan language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is a list which constitutes original research and has an inherently biased point of view which is impossible to contextualise as a list-type article.

It is a partial translation of this article in the Catalan Wikipedia, which has only been translated until 1939. The article is essentially a list of events relating to the Catalan language which editors of the Catalan wikipedia feel constitute "repression", ordered chronologically. The list takes an inherently Catalan nationalist perspective, as it begins from the premise that Catalan should be the dominant language of the regions of Catalonia, Valencia, Northern Catalonia, Franja de Aragón, the Balearic Islands and El Carxe. This leaves no room for discussion of other perspectives and creates an article with an inbuilt POV.

The list is also WP:OR, as it synthesises many sources which (usually but not always) relate to language policy in Spain and France, and assemble the events described into a chronology which is present in none of them. This is particularly evident in the post-war sections of the text, which have yet to be translated, but is still a problem in the text as found here.

An article which discusses the history of state action to minoritise Catalan would be welcome, but it needs to be presented in a neutral way and be discursive, rather than presented as a chronological list of selective facts. Boynamedsue (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Politics, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy/procedural keep‎. (non-admin closure) Reywas92^Talk 16:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Caribbean

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose that this article be deleted in its entirety for the following reasons:

1. No legal or political entity called “Dutch Caribbean” exists. The term is an informal geographic expression with no basis in international or Kingdom law. There is no official governing body or jurisdiction under this name.

2. Misrepresents the constitutional reality of the six territories. Aruba, Curaçao, and Sint Maarten are autonomous countries within the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba are special municipalities of the Netherlands. These islands do not share a government, constitution, or legal framework.

3. Violates Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and verifiability. The article presents “Dutch Caribbean” as if it were a real entity, but provides no legal sources or primary references to support that framing. This misleads readers and contradicts Wikipedia’s standards.

4. The article has real-world consequences. It undermines the recognition of Curaçao and other countries as independent legal entities, causing confusion in international systems and reinforcing outdated colonial narratives.

5. The term should not be used at all. The article is built on a false premise. “Dutch Caribbean” inaccurately groups legally distinct and autonomous countries with Dutch special municipalities, creating a misleading political narrative. The term should not appear in relation to these islands at all — not even in passing — as it distorts their individual identities and legal status.

Conclusion: This article promotes a non-existent political entity and should be deleted in accordance with Wikipedia’s core content policies. Neutralwikifixer (talk) 11:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as sourcing does indeed exist, but please don't use AI/LLMs to craft deletion reasons. — E_F⁵ 13:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. None of the points made here support deleting a 14-year-old page:

1. "Dutch Caribbean" may not be a single legal entity, but it's a notable and widely used geographic and cultural term. WP routinely covers non-political groupings (e.g. Balkans, Scandinavia), and the article clarifies the components' distinct statuses.

2. It accurately details the differing constitutional realities, clearly distinguishing between the autonomous constituent countries and the special municipalities of the Netherlands. I don't see a misrepresentation here.

3. It looks well-sourced and neutrally presents the concept by explicitly explaining the distinct legal statuses of the islands; nowhere is it implied that the region is a unified political body.

4. It clearly explains the distinct statuses. Concerns about reinforcing narratives are subjective; the article primarily documents the factual situation.

5. The term "Dutch Caribbean" is common and notable; you haven't presented any evidence that it creates a "misleading political narrative". — Arcaist ^(contr ^—talk) 13:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep Nominator failed to state their rationale in their own words and this is a common grouping and description for the territories The Netherlands has in the Caribbean. Any LLM responses like above will be ignored, and I have additional concerns about the nominator's name here as someone trying to right great wrongs that simply do not exist, not even getting into how this was their first edit, so this is likely someone who has been here before. Nathannah • 📮 14:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep: If you're going to nominate an article for deletion, at least do it in your own words instead of getting ChatGPT to do it for you. Also strange how this nomination was the user's first edit. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Netherlands, and Caribbean. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Enoteca Boccaccio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE. A few WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS in Melbourne papers are not enough to demonstrate notability especially given the WP:PROMO tone of a lot of this article. The Herald Sun is dubious as a reliable source, nor is notabily inherited because the restaurant is owned by a prominent local family. Dfadden (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, and Australia. Dfadden (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mezha (website)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to any notability. Fails WP:N. Deleted in Russian Wikipedia and Ukrainian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Ukraine. Mitte27 (talk) 10:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Von Grey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never signed to a major label only self-released a handful of EPs and never a full album. The group did some tours as support act but never internationally as far as I can gather. Fails the notability guidelines for WP:MUSIC. Karst (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Karst (talk) 10:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, the page was created by a staff member of Red Light Management who had the band on their roster at the time. See this Billboard article where she is mentioned. Karst (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RSWM Limited

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like revenue targets, profit/financial reporting, share price, new brand launch news etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I am open to reviewing any sources someone can present that meet WP:ORGCRIT, but I cannot locate any in a WP:BEFORE. I tried name variations (including the original name) in Google News, Google Books, and Google Search but there is not enough to add up to significant coverage. I may be searching wrong as I would suspect a company that was founded in 1960 would have more in-depth coverage by now should the public find them worthy of notice. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tega Industries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. The current page looks like a company advertisement copied onto Wikipedia. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Inspirisys

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. The current page looks like a company advertisement copied onto Wikipedia. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VISA Steel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. The current page looks like a company advertisement copied onto Wikipedia. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Odisha-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SPIC (Indian company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources, whether on or off Wikipedia, should be viewed with caution, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like share price fluctuation news are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GSS Infotech

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like revenue targets, profit/financial reporting, funding, acquisitions news etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Andhra Pradesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mastek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like revenue targets, share price, profit/financial reporting, merger, demerger capacity expansion, overseas acquisitions etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the way the article is written feels like it’s mainly trying to promote or advertise something. Wikipedia:PROMO. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kauvery Hospital

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like raising funds, performing successful surgeries etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Created by sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07/Archive CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of erbil 1991

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable, hoax? The sources and external links given either don't work[21], can't be found (Gunter, Michael M. "The Kurdish Uprising in Iraq: 1991"), or don't mention Erbil or a battle in 1991[22][23]. I couldn't find other sources, e.g. this one doesn't mention Erbil. Fram (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Iraq. Fram (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. Created by sockpuppet. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07/Archive CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of mount makok 1987

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unverifiable, hoax? Neither the Human Rights Watch source[24] nor the two books used as sources[25][26] mention Makok (or for the first and third even Rawanduz), and I can find no other sources for this either[27][28]. Fram (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, and Iraq. Fram (talk) 08:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jamna Auto Industries

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like establishing new manufacturing units, acquiring others' production units, expanding overseas business by appointing an expat etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HDIL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like share price performances, investments, rudimentary litigation news, etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EClerx

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in WP:LISTED (or any other) case. Fails to meet WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI. Apart from that, activities like quarter-wise revenue targets, share prices, share buybacks, domestic & overseas acquisitions etc., are merely routine coverage WP:ROUTINE, regardless of where they are published. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zackray

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has used a lot of unreliable sources and fails WP:GNG. I did WP:BEFORE, but there are zero sigcov or lacking of reliable sources about this person. A source like this [29] [30] just states that he just won at The Big House 9 tournament, but that's it. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 14:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 14:32, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:23, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'm confused about how notable are the subject's wins in the world of gaming. Until we have context, I'm not sure what to do. Bearian (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dabuz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has used a lot of unreliable sources and fails WP:GNG. I did WP:BEFORE, but there are zero sigcov or lacking of reliable sources about this person. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 13:22, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Red Bull feature is ok, but I could also see a redirect to his current team. IgelRM (talk) 15:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CyberStep

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notable, verifiable sources proving his subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for a person Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Internet, and Japan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: While I have no opinion on the article, I did want to point out that Wikipedia's notability guidelines for a person—i.e. WP:BIO—would not come into play for an article for a company, which falls under NCORP instead. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked at the sources on JP wiki or done a BEFORE in Japanese? IgelRM (talk) 19:51, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maveric Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, failing Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Additionally, if the content relies on self-published sources, appears promotional, or does not demonstrate a lasting impact Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Software, and Tamil Nadu. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rightware

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, failing Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Additionally, if the content relies on self-published sources, appears promotional, or does not demonstrate a lasting impact Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Finland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
oppose due to inaccurate nomination this article needs to be updated and there is missing information, but it is not fair to say that it should be deleted because it is not notable and relies on promotional material or self published sources when the sources used are TechCrunch, VentureBeat, etc. There are some self published sources that could be removed, and could have been removed by the nominator faster than creating this AfD. At the same time there are plenty of other RS that could be added to enhance the article and improve it such as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 which all support that this firm is notable according to WP:NCORP Nayyn (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which sources meet NCORP? Specifically, which sources contain "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company* and not just regurgitated company info or based on quotes from execs? HighKing⁺⁺ 13:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:15, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Wagner (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page is not required per WP:ONEOTHER: there are only two actually ambiguous terms, and two different spellings. Prod by Frost (talk · contribs) was declined by Barr Theo (talk · contribs). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caribou Lou (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page not required. No mention of "Caribou Lou" at Cocktail or List of cocktails. PROD by 162 etc. (talk · contribs) declined because this has been PRODded before. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Apparently the cocktail/recipe is mentioned in the song itself and became popular(?) as a result, but that can be mentioned in main article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unnecessary disambiguation page. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Korv Stroganoff

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Regional varieties of Stroganoff are already listed in the Beef Stroganoff article. Korv Stroganoff is already mentioned in Beef_Stroganoff#Nordic_countries and its typical ingredients and serving methods are adequately summarised there.

The citations used in this article are also primarily from supermarket websites and cooking recipe blogs; not (WP:RELIABLE). Lea 4545 (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Sweden. Lea 4545 (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Revise the information in the Stroganof article instead.Blockhaj (talk)

Keep. From a quick search there appears to be enough coverage in Swedish RS to support notability (and I am not counting any recipes). Remember that article quality is not a reason for deletion. Sjö (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To further note, majority of the recipies are from major supermarkets. Also, if i remember correctly, when i made the article i added separate doublets for all claims. So in short, "not WP:reliable" does not apply. Blockhaj (talk) 10:50, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then Merge: The deletion proposal was not based on subject notability, nor primarily on article quality. The topic is already adequately covered in the Beef Stroganoff article, making a separate page unnecessary. This constitutes a unacceptable type of content fork per WP:REDUNDANTFORK.

Per WP:PAGEDECIDE: "At times it is better to cover a notable topic as part of a larger page about a broader topic, with more context." This applies here, as Korv Stroganoff is a regional variant of Beef Stroganoff and benefits from being presented within the broader context of related variations. Lea 4545 (talk) 12:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Korv Stroganoff only derives from Beef Stroganoff, but it is its own dish. It is a completely different staple in Sweden and Finland. With this logic it makes more sense to merge Haggis into Pölsa, as the former is just a lamb variant of it. Blockhaj (talk) 12:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Korvstroganoff is a separate dish. It has a distinct role in Swedish society (essentially a kids' meal), very different from the role Beef Stroganoff plays in other Western countries. --Soman (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 07:34, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prime ministerial candidacy of Narendra Modi

Nomination: This article doesn't demand a separate article. This article doesn't seem notable at all and may be formed due to ideological biasness. This article should either be deleted or be merged to Narendra Modi. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:30, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The majority of the info is simply repeated in Narendra Modi section titled Premiership campaigns. His campaigns on there own were not unique and only hold significance because he is the prime minister of India.

The event doesn't hold noteriaty outside of him so it should be found in Narendra Modi article (which a version already exists).

RCSCott91 (talk) 08:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Gujarat-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of aftershocks of the 2025 Myanmar earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the aftershocks are notable and we should not follow the trend of creating aftershock lists without any substantial notability. They are common and expected for large earthquakes of this size. The list just feels like a directory of events recorded by USGS, if there are notable aftershocks, they will appear in List of earthquakes in 2025; the rest don't have any value Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 06:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep None of the aftershocks are notable is blatantly inaccurate. — E_F⁵ 14:00, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a justified argument. Aftershocks are a WP:ROUTINE media coverage for every major earthquake sequence. Merely reporting a single aftershock does not to tell me it's worth keeping is absurd. In fact, the article goes to say; "There were no immediate reports of major damage or casualties caused by the new quake" That automatically fails WP:EVENT. The media will continue to pump content, Wikipedia is not a repository of information for anything on the media without considering layers of factors. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hardly "weak", it clearly disproves the incorrect statement that zero of the aftershocks are notable. — E_F⁵ 14:22, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also note that casualties and damage aren't necessarily a factor in notability, so "This is not a justified argument". — E_F⁵ 14:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Applying WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS does not solidify the argument either Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:31, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dora the Axe-plorer, that's an essay and doesn't need to be strictly followed. — E_F⁵ 14:33, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
And telling me 2024 New Jersey earthquake exist does not solidify your point Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Did the New Jersey earthquake kill anybody? No. "Major damage"? No. Yet, would you look at that, there is a plethora of news sources on it. — E_F⁵ 14:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a very weak argument to link a news article mentioning the aftershock which did not cause any significant impact to tell me it is notable. A nod on the media is a low-bar in notability. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Someone didn't do a BEFORE search! So, again, the deletion reason is blatantly inaccurate, and I'm not looking to argue further on it. — E_F⁵ 14:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Someone doesn't understand what " major damage " is apparently. So much digging yet nothing substantial. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Did you even take one look at the six links I've given? As shown above (OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is an essay and doesn't hold weight in an AfD; I also disagree with its usage here), "major damage" goes to crap if the shock (in this case the 5.5 one) is notable in the media. Things don't have to kill people to be notable. — E_F⁵ 14:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Then my question is why do you think this list should be kept based on one aftershock? Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See below. — E_F⁵ 14:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note in my deletion rationale: "if there are notable aftershocks, they will appear in List of earthquakes in 2025", which this 5.5 aftershock already appears inside. I did not object to that. But do we need an entire list to accommodate one aftershock? It requires more than one event to support the notion to keep this list. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please at least read this Al-J publication. Several aftershocks, not just "one event", are mentioned. At least to me, this and some other publications I mentioned above meet WP:INDEPTH. — E_F⁵ 14:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I read it. Okay, I'll try to rationalise why I think this way: after working on dozens of earthquake articles, these isn't really worthy content to me. In almost every major earthquake, aftershocks will rattle nerves, throw down some damaged buildings, dislodge bricks, etc. Then the humanitarian aid/relief committees would comment about the potential for more aftershocks/people living in the streets due to fear of further shocks. After working on earthquake after earthquake, editors will notice just about the same weight and content repeated to the point one could categotize them under WP:ROUTINE depending on how they interpret it.

I also interpret that this list aims to identify individual aftershocks (thus the table), however few are notable on their own (the 6.7 and 5.5 are exceptions). When Al-J mentions "hindering rescue efforts for those still missing after Friday’s magnitude 7.7 earthquake", for example, it is the cumulative notable qualities of all the aftershocks and their impact on rescue work and post-disaster life. We can't tell individually what their effects are because there is not enough written about them. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 15:01, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - "no aftershocks are notable" is incorrect, but there were only two notable aftershocks I could find - the 6.7 right after and the 5.x like two days ago that caused a bit of damage. Large amounts of aftershocks are common after major quakes.

WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Wildfireupdateman can you strikethrough your previous comment. Each editor gets one vote, your bolded "Support" could be interpreted as another editor's vote (double vote). Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I didn't realize that the old discussion had been transcluded. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

:Would Support a deletion - this quake was actually unusually quiet for its size in terms of aftershocks. In addition, earthquakes such as December 2023 Mindanao earthquake and 2021 South Sandwich Islands earthquakes, which had much more aftershocks than this one. It is unknown how many deaths occurred from the one notable aftershock. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 04:54, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was on my radar for a deletion discussion per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Dawnseeker2000 05:36, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Btw @Dawnseeker2000, this is now an AFD, you may want to indicate delete/keep Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 06:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karbon (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotble unreferenced piece of software --Altenmann >talk 06:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amago Yoshihisa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This only has one source, Kotobank, and that is not a good one. It fails notability and has been tagged due to lacking sources for years. DrGlef (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The corresponding Japanese article makes it clear that the topic is notable. Yes, the sourcing should be improved but that's not an argument for deletion. -- Taku (talk) 07:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A reasonable WP:BEFORE would have found the references on Ja-Wiki. UtherSRG (talk) 10:50, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I echo what the KEEP voters above have said. Subject is historically notable. Goodboyjj (talk) 15:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Azai Hisamasa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This lacks sources for notability. There is only one source, Kotobank, which is questionable. DrGlef (talk) 06:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The corresponding Japanese article lists some reliable sources. So, I don't see any notability issue. Non-English sources can be perfectly reliable. -- Taku (talk) 07:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English sources can be reliable. Most of the Japanese language sources I have seen cited on English wikipedia are websites that aren't reliable. If you could add the Japanese sources to the English article, that would solve the problem, provided that they are reliable. DrGlef (talk) 09:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like said, the corresponding Japanese article gives some reliable sources. They are not personal websites, so they should be reliable. —- Taku (talk) 09:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically,

小和田哲男『近江浅井氏の研究』清文堂、2005年4月20日。ISBN 4-7924-0579-3。
黒田惟信編『東浅井郡志』 2巻、滋賀県東浅井郡教育会、1927年11月28日。doi:10.11501/1242715。
宮島敬一著、日本歴史学会編『浅井氏三代』吉川弘文館〈人物叢書　新装版〉、2008年2月1日。ISBN 978-4-642-05244-3。

For example, 小和田哲男 is a well-known scholar. So the case for the notability seems clear to me. —- Taku (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A reasonable WP:BEFORE would have found the references on Ja-Wiki. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Azai Sukemasa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks sources for notability. The only source is kotobank, which is questionable. DrGlef (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The corresponding Japanese article cites some reliable sources. So, this is an instance "sources exist but are not listed in the article". -- Taku (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A reasonable WP:BEFORE would have found the references on Ja-Wiki. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akai Terukage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for notability and lack of sources since 2015. The only source is has, is not reliable. It is a very short stub. DrGlef (talk) 05:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: have you done a WP:BEFORE for the Japanese language sources in the Japanese version of the article? Stockhausenfan (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know Japanese. DrGlef (talk) 10:03, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aaj Ki Taaqat

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Could not find multiple credible sources. Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 05:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Villilä studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for companies or studios. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kopnakolicti (talk) 07:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Finland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vivienne Pinay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass GNG. Only piece of independent, in-depth coverage is an interview in "Hotspots Magazine" from 2013. The other source with subject's name in headline is just a recap of a reality TV episode on which the subject was eliminated; it is not in-depth coverage of Vivienne Pinay. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Sexuality and gender, Philippines, and Georgia (U.S. state). ꧁Zanahary꧂ 04:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:09, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ENTERTAINER. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 13:18, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, you interpret this person’s one-episode guest spot on Skin Wars and their run on RuPaul’s Drag Race to make them a notable entertainer, despite a lack of notability-establishing coverage? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 16:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked you several times now to leave me alone. I will not be engaging with you further so please do not ask me questions or post on my talk page again. Thanks ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is simply not a reasonable ask when it comes to AfD, and I will not be avoiding your votes in this discussion. You are free to not reply, obviously. Biography subjects need WP:SIGCOV, and this subject does not meet that standard. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:05, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a reasonable thing to say in a public AfD discussion. Stockhausenfan (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In real life the subject is a friend of several friends of mine and, since my partner is Filipino-American, I have found that both the LGBTQ and pinoy worlds are very small and interconnected. So I'm not going to !vote. I feel obligated to point out that the subject was eliminated after the 4th episode of RuPaul's Drag Race, but they also have tens of thousands of followers on social media. Discuss amongst yourselves. Bearian (talk) 18:11, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to RuPaul's Drag Race season 5. Not prominent enough for stand alone article. Reads like a promo. Ramos1990 (talk) 03:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That redirect makes sense to me too ꧁Zanahary꧂ 05:16, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Completely disagree. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 12:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 07:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I would argue that being a member of the Haus of Edwards in addition to the Drag Race and Skin Wars stint qualify them under the first criteria of WP:NENTERTAINER. I think there's room to give the article a badly needed touchup, but outright deletion may not be called for. If I am misunderstanding NENTERTAINER please clarify. Relm (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Opinion is divided between Keep and Redirect. A source review would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Intec Digital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although I'm on the fence, I don't think this organization meets GNG. Of the four sources listed, two are unreliable (i.e., Facebook and Discogs) and one lacks SIGCOV (i.e., DJ Mag). I found an interview in Vice [31] with a paragraph about the company, as well as post at EDM House Network [32], though that could be a press release. Further, this article has been tagged for notability concerns since 2017 with few efforts at improvement. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:10, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Carl Cox. The nomination doesn't give a particularly good sense that this should have been sent to AfD; the nominator isn't strongly in favor of deletion and doesn't mention WP:MUSIC despite this being a music-related topic (it's only referred to as a company, rather than a record label). Many, many AfDs of record labels are label imprints of notable musical artists, and this one is no exception; I'm not sure that there's sufficient reason for a standalone article here, but mentioning it in connection with Cox's other artistic output makes sense. In general, these should be proposed as merges rather than sent to AfD; there's no reason to have a redlink here. Chubbles (talk) 03:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Is there any more support for a possible Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Chibueze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. No independent reliable coverage; most of the coverage consists of "Chibueze said," "Chibueze told," "Chibueze commented," etc. Cinder painter (talk) 11:34, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 11:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
redirect: to PiggyVest, there seems to be more coverage about the compnay than about his person. He's also the founder... Wired seems to be the best source, but it hardly talks about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Oaktree b Does PiggyVest exists? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, it would likely have to be created. It seems notable, most of the coverage here used for this person is about the company. Oaktree b (talk) 14:17, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirecting to a non-existent article is not a viable option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep more sources added and now pass WP:NBASIC for multiple mentions in several credible and reliable independent third party sources. Omaojo (talk) 10:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article now has a whole lot of WP:CITEKILL. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 06:46, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not look notable. He is just an entrpreneur and doe snot display exceptional charcteristcs for a stand alone article. No article exists for PiggyVest either so redirect is not a good alternative. Ramos1990 (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 03:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are multiple sources that are significant enough to meet WP:GNG and WP:NBASIC and have jointly won some awards and honors with co-founders of a notable company without an article here. The article is a stub, and the current sourcing is significant to sustain it. CPDJay (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there are a few sources to pass WP:GNG. Mekomo (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A fairly typical PROMO business biography. Wired is the only source I'd count toward WP:GNG, and that's not enough. The rest are: a promotional article published by a literal marketing agency; WP:CHURNALISM based on podcast WP:INTERVIEWs (original, derivatives here and here; also [33]); more unbylined promo; WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS ([34], [35], [36]); a press release (original release here); and profile from an IT advocacy organization that is not independent. Nothing else here to meet GNG or WP:NBIO. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Unrelated but BellaNaija doesn’t attribute articles to their staffs. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 14:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I'd like to hear more arguments from editors experienced in AFD discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I sadly could not find sufficient WP:INDEPENDENT source to satisfy WP:GNG. PiggyVest is actually a clear-cut notable business and I wish it existed already, redirecting this there would have sufficed as ATD. I also do not have time to write a new article right away, I would have ventured. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tercio of Idiáquez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-sentence sub-stub about a non-notable military formation. Unimproved in sixteen years and likely unimprovable. Would have PRODed it, but someone already tried that, and the prod removed on specious grounds. Ravenswing 04:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Cohen

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Julie Cohen (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability reqs for WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENTERTAINER, or WP:MUSICBIO. scant third party coverage (most of which copies the bio from their band website), no major acting roles, no significant contributions to music. I tried to add sources/improve the page before filing this AfD. I can't see a reason to keep this page. Puppies937 (talk) 04:37, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree per above reasoning. LastJabberwocky (talk) 11:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Wollongong floods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources are from the time of the floods in March 2011. There is no WP:LASTING coverage of this to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Australia. LibStar (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Floods in New South Wales, which already contains most of the information in the article. Agree that this fails WP:NEVENT due to the lack of lasting coverage. I had a look on Google Scholar and Google Books to see if there was any evidence that these floods had been researched or used as a case study, and came up with nothing. And I couldn't find any substantial news coverage from after 2011 either. Happy to change my mind if anyone is able to find meaningful SIGCOV from after 2011, but as far as I can tell this fails WP:NEVENT. MCE89 (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maharaja Chhatra Singh Rana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG issues. None of the cited references provide significant coverage even though most of them are too old. Koshuri ^(グ) 03:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, India, and Madhya Pradesh. Koshuri ^(グ) 03:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not only does it fail to meet WP:SIGCOV, but the article creator has also been found to have AI-generated nearly every article or draft they’ve created. Likely this article is also AI-generated. ApexParagon (talk) 03:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The AI remark makes sense: right now I deleted there a ref to a different book, but with verbatim identical text about this Chattar. Obviously the creator didnt read them. --Altenmann >talk 04:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grits & Eggs (podcast)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find any sources on a WP:BEFORE besides social media, no indication that it meets WP:GNG. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Radio, Entertainment, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Fisher (agent)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've attempted to find any sort of coverage in RS, there doesn't appear to be any, Fails GNG. Iban14mxl (talk) 02:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, Fashion, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Norachit Sinhaseni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable, and I don't see evidence that this one passes WP:GNG/WP:NBIO. The coverage is brief and routine coverage of him in the context of his job, not WP:SIGCOV of him. Please ping if I missed any qualifying sources in my search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Thailand. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article is quite incomplete. After his ambassadorial posts, he was Permanent Secretary for Foreign Affairs, then spokesman of the 2014 junta's Constitution Drafting Committee, and later a representative of Thailand to the Permanent Court of Arbitration. He also had an executive position in Centara and some other companies. But there's not much in-depth coverage. There's an interview in The Nation covering him as an individual, but it's an interview.[37] There's this Khaosod profile piece,[38] but it only lists his positions in résumé format. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. User:Paul 012, since you weighed in here, do you have an opinion on what should become of this article in a closure?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Based on policy I'd say it's a weak delete, but considering that the article creator has a pending unblock request I'd rather postpone a bit further to see if they have anything to say. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Morgpie

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet WP:GNG. Most sources are not significant coverage or from non-reliable sources. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENTERTAINER.

Any independent coverage of her from reliable sources seems to fall under WP:BLP1E. A one-off stunt on Twitch to attempt to circumvent guidelines is not notable.

Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED; however, just because it is not censored doesn't mean that pornographic persons get a pass on meeting notability because people are too afraid to nominate them out of fear of being called a censor.

(renomination after first nomination was speedy-closed due to article being on the Main Page) ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 02:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, Video games, and Texas. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 02:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As the creator of the article, I obviously am advocating for a keep here. It was already speedy kept because it appeared on the main page in the DYK section. This means it already underwent the DYK review process which ensures that referencing is suitable and appropriate, and ensures the article is presentable. If one goes to the DYK nom discussion, they can see this was a bit more of an involved process too. There, I addressed why specific sources worked and conceded ones that didn't. Those that totally didn't have since been removed and replaced. Ultimately, I made sure during that process to have sources within the article to be in-line with how WP:RSP and WP:VG/RS allows for specific sources to be approached/implemented. I apologize if this is in any way inappropriate or out of place, but I figured a courtesy ping for that DYK nom's reviewer (@Tenpop421:) and promoter (@Launchballer:) may end up being helpful to further understand why that DYK nom was successful and found no issues with sourcing.

To be totally comprehensive/fair and address the concerns listed here:

"Fails to meet WP:GNG. Most sources are not significant coverage or from non-reliable sources. Does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENTERTAINER."

No, in my view, this does not fail to meet WP:GNG. Idk why "most sources" matters here (and I know it doesn't as per WP:GNG only asking that articles have significant coverage in reliable sources, but doesn't set any real hard lines on how many of the article's sources need to be meeting that criteria, though I assume the bare minimum is two since plural "reliable sources" is written in criteria). Yes, the majority of sources I incorporated do not do full deep-dives on Morgpie. Some of them mention her in passing, and some of the sources the article uses are there just to verify context around her (i.e. the Ars Technica source). However, there are present multiple sources that do satisfy the criteria of being significant coverage and reliable: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. I'd also argue other sources such as 6, and 7 help supplement/flesh out the article's sourcing. Basically, if there was a lack of sourcing present in regards to satisfying WP:GNG, it would be made up by the whole being greater than the sum of the parts here (in terms of sourcing). But like I'm saying, ample sourcing is there.

Also WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:ENTERTAINER is met in aggregate here. Those criteria are so briefly detailed/described, but points 1 and 2 in WP:CREATIVE are met here. Those two points that ask the individual to (1) be regarded as important/cited by peers and (2) have originated a new concept/theory/technique. That's covered by the fact that there is sourcing present (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) that cites her originating metas (essentially Twitch content-equivalent of a concept/technique/genre) that influenced other creators on the platform (whether they like her content or not). Here's an additional source of one of the platform's biggest creators (Cr1TiKaL, who in this case would be considered her peer or at least contemporary on Twitch) calling her the "most influential". I would say this sort of thing also helps satisfy point 2 ("The person has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.") of the WP:ENTERTAINER criteria.

"Any independent coverage of her from reliable sources seems to fall under WP:BLP1E. A one-off stunt on Twitch to attempt to circumvent guidelines is not notable."

This wasn't a "one-off stunt" though. Sourcing present, especially from 2024, make it clear that she has multiple times influenced other creators on the platform (as well as the platform itself to respond to her content). Sentences from sourcing present in the article include: (1); "This isn't the first time Morgpie's creativity has led Twitch to a reactionary policy change"; (2); "several risqué streams hosted by one of the platform's most notorious boundary pushers. Morgpie, who played a pivotal in the "topless meta" that flourished on Twitch last December, found a new way to challenge Twitch's censors". The other points in the WP:BLP1E criteria ("The person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual" and "The event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented" are also not applicable here; as an active streamer, she is not even trying to remain a low-profile individual; and her role in the "one-off stunt" here (again not a one-off, anyway, but if it was,) was both substantial and well documented.

Also, as a further consideration, she was a pornographic actress prior to becoming a Twitch streamer, which further suggests she isn't notable for one event, and this is also bolstered by her winning of major porn industry awards (1), 2) which also establishes her as notable outside of the Twitch content sphere.

"Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED; however, just because it is not censored doesn't mean that pornographic persons get a pass on meeting notability because people are too afraid to nominate them out of fear of being called a censor."

I actually don't care about this. I definitely am assuming good faith here in the nomination. I also honestly wouldn't know whether pornographic-industry bios are more or less likely to be tagged for deletion. I do think the nomination (in my view) is closer to snow side of the spectrum than not, but I don't think it was maliciously intended nor do I think you're trying to be a censor.

Soulbust (talk) 04:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:26, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vijay Nahar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orignal creator of this article was blocked for WP:COI and WP:PROMO. This persons fails WP:GNG as well as WP:AUTHOR, due to lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Also most of the sources on this article are not about him, hence checked carefully. It may be created for undisclosed payments because this article creator also created articles on his multiple books which are also nothing more than promotion. Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR TheSlumPanda (talk) 02:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, India, and Rajasthan. TheSlumPanda (talk) 02:19, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep

The article on Vijay Nahar should be retained. There is sufficient coverage in a wide range of independent and reliable sources, satisfying Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline for authors, historians, and public figures. His work spans historical biographies, political commentary, and education-focused literature. Below is a list of significant sources that discuss his contributions:
=== Media & News Coverage: ===
=== Literary & Historical Commentary: ===
=== Library Catalogs & Book Listings: ===
----These references clearly demonstrate both the coverage and influence of Vijay Nahar’s work. While the Wikipedia article might benefit from improvements in structure, formatting, and inline citations, the subject himself meets Wikipedia's notability threshold. Therefore, the article should be improved, not dele Gujjar.rudraa (talk) 19:52, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Almost all sources are not about this subject. Some are about maharana Pratap, or other are about modi or vasundra raje, also the #2 TOI article is a reliable source but that talks more about the book written by him. And please remind that online listing of books for purchase like Amazon doesn’t confer notability. TheSlumPanda (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Vijay Nahar is an Indian author and historian known for his biographical and historical works on notable Indian political figures and Rajput kings. His book Swarnim Bharat ke Swapndrishtha Narendra Modi has been referenced in multiple media outlets, including The Sunday Guardian, for its early commentary on Narendra Modi’s developmental vision and personal life aspects, including his marriage, which was highlighted during political discourse (The Sunday Guardian, Amar Ujala).

Nahar’s biography of Vasundhara Raje, Vasundhara Raje aur Viksit Rajasthan, is among the first dedicated publications on her political career and is noted in news profiles (Jansatta). His contributions to historical research include books on Samrat Bhoj Parmar, Mihir Bhoj, and Rao Akheraj Songara, which have been cited in literary platforms such as Sahitya Kunj and Sahitya Nama, and are among the few comprehensive modern works available on these historical figures (Sahitya Kunj, Udaipur Kiran).

In the context of Maharana Pratap, Nahar's writings have been used in regional discourse to support the view that Pratap was born in Pali, Rajasthan—challenging the traditionally cited location of Kumbhalgarh attributed to Colonel Tod (Bhaskar, Samvad). His contributions have also been recognized through awards and coverage in local media outlets, emphasizing his role in historical interpretation and education.

While online listings like Amazon do not independently confer notability, they help identify the range and accessibility of his publications. Furthermore, his books have been featured in school libraries in Rajasthan, according to a report by The Times of India (TOI). Gujjar.rudraa (talk) 03:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
His book on narendra modi got media coverage like 1, 2. While the sunday guardian have only passing mention at last which is not enough. But if we talk about notability of this subject them i am still inclined toward deletion because of lack of Significant coverage about him in independent sources rather than sticking only on his modi book.TheSlumPanda (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
== Sources supporting notability ==
Lokmat Times – Photos of Gulab Kataria Ji – Features visuals and associations, including those connected to historian Vijay Nahar and other BJP figures.

Dainik Bhaskar – Pali historian Nahar got Bhandari Honors in Udaipur – Reports on a prestigious honor conferred to Vijay Nahar, recognizing his contributions to historical literature.

Sahitya Kunj – Samraat Bhoj Parmar Sameeksha – A critical review of Vijay Nahar’s historical writing on King Bhoj, hosted by a Hindi literary platform.

Jansatta – Vasundhara Raje’s political profile – Refers to authors including Nahar who’ve written about Rajasthan’s leadership and political figures.

Punjab Kesari – Maharana Pratap Jayanti – Covers public celebration of figures about whom Vijay Nahar has authored biographies.

News Puran – Death Anniversary of Maharana Pratap – Discusses cultural memory around Maharana Pratap, a key figure in Vijay Nahar’s historical works.

Samvad.in – It’s a lie that Maharana Pratap ate grass loaves – Offers myth-busting perspectives in history also reflected in Vijay Nahar’s revisionist narratives.

Jain Gazette – Freedom Fighter Mention – Reflects on themes of patriotism and freedom fighters that appear in Nahar’s works.

Sarkari Manthan – Maharana Pratap statue tribute – Reports community events inspired by figures researched by Vijay Nahar.

Sahitya Nama – Maharana Pratap articles – Discusses literary works on Maharana Pratap, including those by Nahar.

Udaipur Kiran – Book review: Pali Naresh Akheraj Songara – Reviews a book authored by Vijay Nahar, showcasing his reach in historical documentation.

Amar Ujala – Book on Modi and Jashodaben – Reports on Nahar’s controversial yet widely discussed book on Narendra Modi's early life.

Pathey Kan – Maharana Pratap death anniversary – Further evidence of Nahar’s engagement with historical storytelling in public discourse.

OneIndia Hindi – Book on Narendra Modi – A news piece discussing the content and release of Nahar’s book on Modi.

Hindi Kunj – Article on Bhoja – Provides literary context for historical kings such as Bhoja, also studied by Nahar.

Dainik Bhaskar (Mat) – Historical works in Pali – Features Vijay Nahar as a local historian contributing to regional identity.

Patrika – Maharana Pratap Jayanti, women’s role – Cultural event tied to figures researched and published by Nahar.

Public Live – Local event coverage – Mentions contributions of historians including Nahar in community awareness.

Dainik Bhaskar (Rohida) – Need for research on Rao Sinhaji Rathore – Features local historians including Nahar advocating for deeper research.

Surabhi Saloni – Historical commemoration article – Echoes Nahar’s themes of valor and historical justice.

Press Note – Educational event report – Discusses academic contributions by Vijay Nahar in educational forums.

Pathey Kan – Historical pieces on Pratap – Platform hosting several pieces aligned with Nahar's themes.

Pathey Kan (alternate) – Akbar vs Maharana Pratap – Reflects on contrasting historical figures often discussed in Vijay Nahar’s writings.

BJP Library Catalog – Vijay Nahar books in BJP Library – Lists Nahar’s books held in BJP-associated library catalog, confirming institutional presence.

Jagran Josh – List of books on PM Modi – Includes Vijay Nahar among notable authors writing about PM Modi.

Amazon – Vasundhara Raje Aur Viksit Rajasthan – One of Vijay Nahar’s published books on Rajasthan politics, available through major retailers.

Amazon – Haldighati Yuddha Vijayeta Maharana Pratap – Another key historical publication by Nahar, highlighting the Battle of Haldighati.

Sahitya Kunj – Vijay Nahar Author Profile – A central repository of Nahar’s literary contributions and publications.

Most of the sources cited to support the notability of Vijay Nahar are from Hindi-language newspapers and online publications. However, these are established and widely circulated media outlets in India, such as Dainik Bhaskar, Amar Ujala, Rajasthan Patrika, Punjab Kesari, Jansatta, and the Hindi edition of Times of India. These outlets are considered reliable sources under Wikipedia guidelines for regional and vernacular coverage.

The references include interviews, book reviews, coverage of public recognitions and awards, listings of published works, and inclusion of his books in institutional libraries. Several sources document his contributions as a biographer of public figures like Narendra Modi, Vasundhara Raje, and Maharana Pratap. Many of these sources offer English summaries or have accessible translations. Gujjar.rudraa (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I repeat none of these sources cover this person in depth, lack WP:SIGCOV also most of these sources are non reliable TheSlumPanda (talk) 15:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gujjar.rudraa have you edited only this person page since creation of your wiki account ?TheSlumPanda (talk) 15:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need to hear from more editors willing to research the sources offered in the article and discussion. Would the two editors who have participated so far please take a step back and let other editors weigh in? Please let them comment without adding your opinions to their arguments. Thank you.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vasundhara Raje Aur Viksit Rajasthan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orignal creator of this article was blocked for WP:COI and WP:PROMO. This article is also nothing more than a promotion. This book is not significantly covered by secondary sources in depth. Only source i found is the Dainik bhaskar, which is actually not about the book and it is about the launch of book (as it is about chief minister so it got some attention). Clearly fails WP:NBOOK. TheSlumPanda (talk) 01:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Rajasthan. TheSlumPanda (talk) 01:56, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:40, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Helman Palije

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Was eliminated in first bout. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Olympics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Malawi at the 1988 Summer Olympics: As I suggested when I declined the PROD, redirect as a WP:ATD. No WP:SIGCOV is cited and a cursory G News/Books search didn't come up with anything. Let'srun (talk) 03:32, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Malawi at the 1988 Summer Olympics - These machine generated non notable olympic competitor stubs are all trending redirect to the relevant Olympics page. Instead of using PROD, could these be redirected under WP:BLAR instead, as that will save a lot of unnecessary time at AfD. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:18, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For competitors who only appeared at one Olympics, I think that is a viable way to move forward. Let'srun (talk) 12:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given how many have turned out to be notable when inspected close enough, I don't think redirecting them all en masse is appropriate. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A BLAR takes me considerably more effort than was put into creating these. We are not talking about en masse. This is a manual process that follows editor review of sourcing, establishing the redirect is not controversial, that the article is problematic and sourcing unavailable. It is simply reverted should anyone object. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A BLAR takes me considerably more effort than was put into creating these – really? I could BLAR one of these in like, 10 seconds if I wanted to. If you're actually looking for sources I'd be more supportive (though I'd still not entirely support); unfortunately many editors who try to delete Olympics articles don't do that, which is why I don't like the idea of giving a 'green light' to redirection. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:49, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Bob's Wonderland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable restaurant (formerly a ShowBizz pizza location, now independent) that does not appear to have any SIGCOV outside of local media profiles. nf utvol (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Entertainment, and West Virginia. nf utvol (talk) 01:58, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: "Local media profiles" appears to be an inaccurate description. Several of the cited sources are news stories, not profiles, and at least two of the news sources are non-local: USA Today is a national news source, and while WOAY-TV is from West Virginia, Oak Hill, West Virginia isn't local—I live just a few miles from the restaurant, though I've never been there, and we've never gotten WOAY in this area; our local ABC affiliate is WCHS-TV. Oak Hill isn't part of the local area; it's more than 90 miles away. The coverage looks like what you would expect for a local attraction, and is more than you'd see for some that meet the minimum standards for notability. The fact that it was once part of a chain—many years ago, apparently—does not make it non-notable as an independently-operated restaurant with a distinctive identity. P Aculeius (talk) 11:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Matt (gamer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. The interviews sourced in the article at present are by reliable sources, but this is arguably routine seasonal coverage. This player did not achieve any significant results during his career; when he was in a tier-one league, his team never made top-three, peaking at fourth place (semifinals). Yue🌙 01:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and United States of America. Yue🌙 01:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Matt Elento ("Matt") competed in the NA LCS, a fully professional league, and has reliable, independent coverage from ESPN, invenglobal.com, tsn.ca, Polygon, DBLTAP, thenextweb.com etc. Goodboyjj (talk) 16:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hard (gamer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. No in-depth coverage in reliable sources; given sources are routine coverage. This player did not achieve any significant results during his career; when he was in a tier-one league with Echo Fox, his team never made playoffs. Yue🌙 01:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Video games, and Canada. Yue🌙 01:51, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Montz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any meaningful WP:SIGCOV on this player that isn't attached to a club or academy for which he played or coached—i.e. nothing independent. Anwegmann (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Anwegmann (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Florida, and Louisiana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, appears to (weakly) pass GNG, see e.g. this, this, this and this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald and Sheila Broflovski

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, and not quite sure if I can find any SIGCOV after doing BEFORE. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 00:54, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:12, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If found to be NN, this either needs to me merged to either or both of Kyle Broflovski and List of South Park characters. Jclemens (talk) 04:56, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per the sources I, um, found in the previous short-lived AfD and had long since forgotten about. Jclemens (talk) 05:48, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources provided in the last AfD. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw Oops, I guess there is an existing afd that already happened before with sources. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 10:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Narendra Chaudhary (soldier)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria for notability, reliability, or reliable sources. The single English language source is of extremely poor quality. Audrey Woolf (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and India. Audrey Woolf (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: In case this page was kept, please move this article to Narendra Chaudhary, as the page is currently red-linked and current title includes unnessesary disambiguation. Thanks and no opinion on the AFD itself. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Basic google searches didn't find anything beyond what is already in the article, a couple of marginal sources. There is not enough to support a biography. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Luciano Delbono

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. The current references in the article are comprised of references from clubs and leagues the subject played for, and are not independent. Let'srun (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Finland, and North Carolina. Let'srun (talk) 00:10, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Armando Avila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, California, and Nevada. Let'srun (talk) 00:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doesn't have enough reliable sources or they are just mentions.Darkm777 (talk) 01:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 15:20, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete—Fail WP:SIGCOV. Anwegmann (talk) 16:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]