Jump to content

Talk:Sailor Moon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleSailor Moon was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
August 4, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
April 25, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 18, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 13, 2009Good article reassessmentListed
September 29, 2013Good article reassessmentDelisted
August 16, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
May 19, 2021Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 4 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AnnabethChase204 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sethclaymon, Elissaking.

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Procedurally closed CMD (talk) 16:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the previous assessment and delisting of this article, I have seemingly noticed that the community has made great strides in performing whatever cleanup and corrections needed to meet the criteria for GA. At the time of this article's delisting in 2013, I had noticed the article had been subjected to much fancruft in text and citations, such as referencing only blogs and/or fansites, which contained zero encyclopedia-appropriate material and original research. In today's observation, the fancruft all but does not exist (if not, at a miniscule level), and the references are only news sources without linking to fansites and/or original research. I might not fully understand if this was the reason for the 2013 delisting, but I would like to leave this reevaluation to the community to decide.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 05:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I was unaware.--Loyalmoonie (talk) 05:05, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sailor Moon idol groupe

[edit]

Are they still existing as an official SM project or not? The article seems to imply that they gradually moved to a more subtle association than initially, but this is not described anywhere. Also, I had to rewrite some of the section parts, because it looks like someone, through original research, linked one of their singles from last year to them celebrating Pride Month for some reason. They truly wished fans a Happy Pride Month as a Japanese-American group, but the text were misleading, implying the single's release was part of a celebration, which it was not. Solaire the knight (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Plot proposal

[edit]

While I've temporarily trimmed down the plot section since the idea is to summarize its plot and not its individual story arcs, I think we should include a potential setting subsection in that particular section as necessary. For reference, Dragon Ball (a B-class article) and One Piece (a GA) have plot sections containing both the setting and premise. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:55, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]